Nice — below is a concise, source-backed market reference for the Integrated Pest Management (IPM) — Pheromones market with company references + values (where public) and the exact sections you asked for. I used recent market reports, company pages, press releases and R&D literature so the main claims are traceable — I cite the most important sources inline.

Read complete report at: https://www.thebrainyinsights.com/report/integrated-pest-management-pheromones-market-12655

Quick company references (major pheromone / IPM players & values)

Note: many pheromone companies are private or report pheromone revenues inside broader business lines; where exact pheromone-only revenue isn’t public I list a reliable size/proxy (funding, group turnover or public statements).

• Provivi (US / Israel) — ag-biotech pheromone innovator focused on scalable pheromone production and mating-disruption for row crops and specialty crops. Funding raised ≈ US$185–212M (Series rounds & public disclosures); independent estimates put current annual revenues in the low tens of millions as the company commercialises at scale. 

• Trécé, Inc. (US) — long-standing supplier of pheromone dispensers, traps and monitoring systems (CIDETRAK™ line etc.). Market leader for orchard monitoring and mating-disruption dispensers; R&D & product literature documents micro-encapsulated dispenser technology used in trials.

• Suterra (US, part of Wonderful Companies ecosystem) — major commercial supplier of mating-disruption and monitoring lures for tree fruit, vine and specialty crops; product launches and field deployments reported across five continents.

• ISCA Technologies (US) — manufacturer of monitoring lures/pheromone products and innovator in biological & semiochemical solutions (company public site and project portfolios). Small-to-mid sized specialist (public listings/estimates put revenue in the single-digit to low-double-digit millions range).

• Koppert Biological Systems (NL) — large biologicals / IPM company that bundles biocontrols with pheromone-based monitoring / solutions; company reported as a high hundreds-of-millions € turnover group in industry profiles (~€400M scale cited in market profiles).

• Large chemical / formulation houses & specialty chem firms that supply pheromone actives, chemistries or dispensers: BASF, Shin-Etsu, Bedoukian Research, Gowan, Russell IPM (these companies appear repeatedly in market reports and competitive lists).

Market size & recent development (numbers & synthesis)

• Representative market values (different reports, different scopes): most recent independent reports converge on a global IPM / agricultural pheromones market in the range ~USD 0.9–5.0 billion (2023–2025) depending on whether the report counts only IPM pheromones/dispensers (lower end) or the full agricultural pheromones & dispensers market (higher end). Key forecasts project CAGRs commonly from ~8% to >15% to 2030, with many vendor reports highlighting strong double-digit growth driven by mating disruption and monitoring adoption. (Examples: Dimension / Meticulous / StrategicMarketResearch / Fortune Business Insights / MarketsandMarkets — see sources).

• Near-term analyst consensus: IPM-pheromone market value estimates for 2024 frequently appear in the ~USD 0.9–1.4B bracket (narrow IPM pheromone definition), while broader “agricultural pheromone” reports quote USD 3–5B+ for 2024 and project to double/treble by 2030 under high-adoption scenarios. Use the narrower figure if you mean regulated IPM pheromone products + dispensers only. 

Recent developments

• Big ag partnerships & fund raises: Provivi and other scale-ups have attracted large equity rounds and partnerships (e.g., Provivi funding and Syngenta/Bio-partnerships), enabling scaleup of low-cost pheromone production and field trials in row crops.

• Wider adoption in high-value orchards & large field-crop pilots: mating disruption is moving from specialty orchards into larger acreage programs (rice stem-borer, fall armyworm trials, large-scale apple/almond programs).

• Improved dispenser & formulation tech: microencapsulation, long-life dispensers and liquid microcapsule mating-disruption products (improved rain-fastness / season-long release) are becoming standard in new launches and trials.

Drivers

1. Regulatory & retailer pressure to reduce synthetic pesticide residues — drives growers to IPM tools (pheromones are non-toxic, species-specific).

2. High value of orchard / specialty crops where residue-free control is essential (fruit, nut, grape) — these crops justify mating disruption costs.

3. Scale-up of low-cost pheromone production (biotech routes & process improvements) — lowers unit cost and enables use in broader field crops.

4. Digital agriculture & monitoring integration — pheromone traps + remote sensing + data platforms improve scouting and ROI.

Restraints

• Product cost & per-acre economics — pheromone mating disruption can be costlier per acre than a spray for low-value crops; ROI is strongest in high-value crops unless production cost falls.

• Species specificity & need for accurate diagnosis — pheromones target species precisely, so broad-spectrum outbreaks or mixed pest complexes still need complementary tools.

• Supply chain & manufacturing scale limits — specialized synthesis, dispenser manufacturing and laying/installation logistics can bottleneck rapid expansion.

Regional segmentation analysis

• North America — mature adopter market (orchards, almonds, tree fruit, grapes); high monitor/mating-disruption penetration and strong commercial supply chains. North America often represents a large share of IPM spend in published reports. 

• Europe — large orchard & specialty produce markets with strict residue rules; strong adoption in fruit & viticulture and regulator encouragement for IPM.

• Asia-Pacific — fastest projected CAGR (large crop areas, rising IPM programs). Recent commercial pilots (e.g., rice stem borer, FAW) and partnerships drive near-term growth in India, SE Asia and China.

• Latin America / MEA — mixed adoption: strong opportunities in export orchards (Chile, Peru, South Africa) and citrus/fruit exporters that need residue-free produce. 

Emerging trends

• Biotech production & plant-based pheromone platforms (lower cost routes, e.g., plant expression of pheromone precursors).

• Large-scale mating-disruption for row crops — trials in rice, maize and sugarcane (if costs drop) are moving pheromones beyond niche orchards.

• Integration with services (subscription / SaaS + deployment) — companies bundling product + deployment + analytics to sell repeatable ROI to growers. 

Top use cases

1. Mating disruption in orchards & vineyards (codling moth, tortricids, codling moth, oriental fruit moth).

2. Mass trapping & monitoring for early detection (fruit flies, moth complexes).

3. Area-wide pest suppression programs (regional mating disruption to protect export-oriented production).

Major challenges

• Cost / scale economics for broadacre adoption — unless production costs fall or deployment models change, adoption in low-value field crops will be limited.

• Need for proven long-term efficacy data in each crop/region — growers require replicated trials and extension support. 

• Regulatory & registration complexity by country — active ingredients, dispensers and monitoring tools may face different regulatory pathways.

Attractive opportunities

• Commercial scale-up (Provivi & others) to lower unit cost and enable field-crop economics. Partnerships with majors (Syngenta/Bio etc.) accelerate distribution.

• Service models (install + subscription + analytics) that convert pheromone products into recurring revenue and easier grower adoption.

• Area-wide programs tied to export credentials — exporters willing to pay premiums for residue-free certification (fruit & nuts). 

Key factors of market expansion

1. Continued price reductions in pheromone production (biotech & process improvements). 

2. Regulatory pressure (pesticide restrictions) and retailer/reseller residue demands pushing adoption of non-toxic IPM tools. 

3. Evidence of ROI in larger acreage (trials showing equivalent economic control) enabling movement into lower-value crops. 

4. Integration of pheromones into digital IPM stacks (monitoring + prescriptive analytics + logistics) to reduce perceived adoption friction.

High-priority sources (pick any to open)

• Meticulous Research — IPM Pheromones market to 2031 (USD 2.2B by 2031).

• Dimension Market Research — IPM pheromones ~USD 1.14B (2024). 

• MarketsandMarkets / Fortune Business Insights / StrategicMarketResearch / Coherent / Databridge — larger agricultural-pheromone market reports (range USD 3–5B+ depending on scope). 

• Company / technology pages: Provivi (funding & announcements), Trécé (CIDETRAK / microencapsulated dispensers), Suterra product pages; Koppert sustainability/annual materials. 

If you want I can now (pick one) and produce immediately from these sources:

• a standardised competitor table (Provivi, Suterra, Trécé, ISCA, Koppert, Shin-Etsu/Bedoukian) with public funding/group revenue, product lines (mating disruption vs monitoring vs dispensers) and core geographies;

• a 1-page PDF market brief (market size ranges, best-guess 5-year CAGR, 3 commercial go-to-market recommendations for a pheromone start-up or CPG buyer); or

• a regional slide (North America / Europe / APAC) with top crop targets, top suppliers and prioritized entry strategy.

Which of those should I generate now?